Case A – One of eight from the section on COLLABORATION:
Filbert and Framboise have worked closely together on their
archaeology paper, which their archaeology professor, the legendary
Michigan Smith, encouraged. Professor Smith said that they could
work together to do the research, but the writing of the papers needed
to be done by the students individually. Filbert and Framboise,
in discussion about the paper, decided to take a particular approach to
problems at the Ann Arbor excavation. Filbert decided to cite the
discussion and agreed approach, but Framboise did not.
HAS FRAMBOISE VIOLATED THE CODE OF HONOR?
A. NO. Professor
Smith knew the students were discussing the paper, so Framboise did not
violate the Code of Honor.
B. NO. As long as
Framboise was not taking material from a published source, but only
from a common discussion, she need not have cited Filbert.
C. YES. The idea
was not Framboise's alone, but rather a shared product. Both
students should have cited their discussion.
D. YES, because two
students’ agreeing to take a particular approach on a paper is
tantamount to cheating.
(For answers and explanations, click the letter for each choice)
Citation: administrator. (2006, October 04). Sample Case A. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from Notre Dame OpenCourseWare Web site: http://ocw.nd.edu/university-resources/university-honor-code-tutorial/sample-case-a.
University of Notre Dame, 2006,
by the Contributing Authors.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.