Lecture Notes on Unit XI: Catholic Social Teaching on the Environment
The centerpiece for this week is the 1991 pastoral statement, Renewing the Earth, by the US Catholic Bishops. The Catholic Church is a relative late-comer in developing an ecological ethic and in calling for personal and political action on behalf of environmental sustainability. Influential Vatican II-era encyclicals such as Gaudium et spes and Populorum Progressio express both an unabashed confidence in human resourcefulness and an inattention to the ecological consequences of development (and “super-development”). By "Renewing the Earth", we see what Pope John Paul II called “a growing ecological consciousness.”
Although the Bishops acknowledge the scientific uncertainty and controversy surrounding concerns for accelerated rates of climate change, diminishing biodiversity, deforestation, and the implications of widespread dependencies on fossil fuels, they nonetheless identify environmental integrity as a moral imperative for today. Elsewhere, arguments for a right to development, particularly for the nations of the “third world,” have increasingly been tempered by concerns for long and short term environmental costs. Thus, Catholic social teaching increasingly promotes sustainable development, i.e., "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." (Brundtland Commission, 1987).
The Bishops acknowledge that Catholic social thought does not contain a fully developed ecological ethics. Still, the Judeo-Christian tradition (which they admit has sometimes been used to justify human exploitation of the earth) contains rich resources for the promotion of ecological responsibility. For example, the Hebrew Scriptures describe creation in terms which give rise to a demand for right-relation, not only between persons, but between the human and non-human in creation. The Bishops go on to identify seven core principles or themes in CST in service of ecological conversion:
Two additional articles highlight particular and often overlooked vulnerabilities to environmental choices. “Do Tomorrow’s Children Count? Resources for an Intergenerational Ethic in Roman Catholic Social Thought” is a work-in-progress, which notes the special vulnerabilities of children to environmental toxins and aims to more fully develop an intergenerational ethic from the perspective of CST. Bullard’s “Dismantling Environmental Racism in the US” traces the relationship between race and exposure to environmental toxins.