Non-Violence
Notes - Peace as a Non-Violent Movement for Change
Peace as a Non-Violent Movement for Change
Thus far with non-violence…
- Some focus on the dimensions that inform personal positions
- Some debate about the “onus” of non-violence and its viability
- Now, some more focus on the use of non-violence - aimed at social change, dealing with repression/oppression, etc.
Note: watch for this in current events! (Zimbabwe, 2006-07?)
How this has worked:
Gandhi
- Satyagraha as the organizing principle
- “Truth force” or “soul force” as holding on to the truth (and searching for it)
- Action agenda: Refusal to do harm as a means of testing the search for truth
- Refusal to accept evil: Use self-sacrifice to discipline oneself, impress and focus target
- Aims at persuasion of the opponent, not defeat. The goal is mutual agreement
Martin Luther King
The pursuit of two fundamental truths:
- All people are created equal under God and the U.S. Constitution. Segregation violates this: it is a misinterpretation of the law. In fact, it is a rejection of the law of the land that has stood since the 1870s. It has developed a series of unjust laws which must be rejected. We seek agreement on this truth.
- Segregation represses whites as well as Negroes, but in a more subtle and unconscious manner. Most terribly, it forces white Christians to violate the call to justice which is so central to the Gospel that they love. Our action will help to remove the cloud from their eyes.
- Principle - There is no peace, nor justice when rights are being violated. Some need to self-suffer for their own rights to bring peace and justice for all
- Plan of action - Varied; civil disobedience
- Disciplined leadership and participation
- Targets - Rather calculated
Other examples:
- 1980s Solidarity Movement in Poland
- 1986 - Forcing Marcos from office in the Philippines
- 1988 -The Palestinian Intifada
- 2000 forcing Milosevic from power
- Within US, various forms of civil disobedience - Anti-nuclear movement; some elements of the pro-life movement
Nonviolence for social change
- Principles - Those of the individuals but also an organizing scheme; the belief that will bind people to put themselves “on the line”
- Plan of action - Where nonviolence as principle and nonviolence as an action strategy meet
- Disciplined leadership and participation
- Particular set of targets
“Letter from the Birmingham Jail”
MLK's letter relates nonviolent direct action (NVDA) to issues of religious principle, racial justice and civil disobedience. It also tackles “critics” of NVDA and the problem of “moderates”
| Paragraph(s) | Non-Violent Direct Action in King's Letter |
|---|---|
|
1 - 5 |
|
|
6 and 10 |
The steps of NVDA:
|
| 7 and 9 | Step 1: some of the facts |
| 8 |
Steps 3-4: purification and training |
| 10-11 | Comments on direct action - there cannot be conciliation unless there is confrontation |
| 12-13 | Now we face a problem when people disagree about the style of confrontation & the burden of history |
| 14 – 21 |
Doctrine of Civil Disobedience
|
| 22-25 |
Justice Dimensions of NVDA
|
| Violence and extremism: | |
| 24-25 |
|
| 26-30 |
|
| 31-32 |
|
| 33-43 |
|
| 44-47 |
What is peace?
|
University of Notre Dame, 2008,
by the Contributing Authors.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License
Cite/attribute Resource.
Lopez, G. (2008, August 27). Non-Violence. Retrieved May 22, 2012, from Notre Dame OpenCourseWare Web site: http://ocw.nd.edu/peace-studies/introduction-to-peace-studies/lectures/outlines/non-violence.






















