Screensaver Rubric

Assessment Rubric for Screensaver Project

  Full credit Substantial credit Some credit Minimal or no credit
Functionality

(70%)		 Meets file size, running time, and stage size requirements; shows knowledge of Flash animation, all fonts display correctly One of the requirements is not met, shows good understanding of Flash animation. Shows minimal ability with Flash, more than one requirement is not met. Meets very few of the requirements, shows little or no mastery of Flash animation.

Comments:
Content

(20%)		 Tells a compelling story or appeals to the imagination; tasteful; "saves the screen;" highly creative or funny; no copyright issues Story line is clear or abstract animation flows smoothly Minimally hangs together, one or more copyright issues, Does not "save the screen," slideshow-only, no theme, tasteless or crude

Comments:
Aesthetics

(10%)		 Visually very appealing, shows excellent understanding of design, text easy to read, images intact at required screen size, appropriate pace, smooth transitions Appealing, shows good understanding of design, one or two issues Limited appeal, limited design understanding, text is hard to read, a number of issues Very little visual appeal, nearly impossible to read, images break up, way too fast or too slow

Comments:

 

Citation: lschilli. (2007, October 11). Screensaver Rubric. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from Notre Dame OpenCourseWare Web site: http://ocw.nd.edu/computer-applications/applied-multimedia-technology/projects-1/screensaver-rubric.
Copyright 2012, by the Contributing Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Creative Commons License