Image Portfolio Assessment Rubric
Document Actions
Assessment Rubric for Image Editing Portfolio Project
| Full credit | Substantial credit | Some credit | Minimal or no credit | |
| Functionality (70%) |
Many editing techniques used, images shared online, blog posting done | Items missing, a number of editing techniques used | No blog post, limited editing | Meets very few of the requirements |
|
Comments: |
||||
| Content (20%) |
Source and transformation posted online; good variety of images or consistent theme; tasteful; highly creative or funny | Some variety, good use of humor or creativity | Information missing, little variety or creativity | No explanations, no variety, tasteless or crude |
|
Comments: |
||||
| Aesthetics (10%) |
Visually very appealing, shows excellent understanding of design (repetition, contrast, etc.), all graphic text easy to read. | Appealing, shows good understanding of design, one or two issues | Limited appeal, limited design understanding, much text is hard to read | Very little visual appeal, nearly impossible to read |
|
Comments: |
||||
Copyright 2012,
by the Contributing Authors.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License
Cite/attribute Resource.
lschilli. (2007, October 08). Image Portfolio Assessment Rubric. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Notre Dame OpenCourseWare Web site: http://ocw.nd.edu/computer-applications/applied-multimedia-technology/projects-1/image-portfolio-rubric.
